Skip to main content
RESEARCH · DESCRIPTIVE SCREEN

Secret Arena — descriptive crypto market screen

A plain description of the liquid crypto market: regime, trend, RSI, volatility and liquidity for each asset, computed from public Binance candles. It describes the market; it does not predict it, and it does not tell anyone what to buy.

Loading the last refresh…

Measured verdict

The score shown in this screen is not a proven trading signal. Over 162 days (30 April to 8 October 2026), its Top 5 did what a random draw from the same universe does.

Top 5 vs random, 24 h
+0.12%
95% CI [−0.35; +0.58] · 162 periods
Top 5 vs random, 7 d
−0.48%
95% CI [−1.48; +0.52] · 23 periods
Daily momentum (7 d / 30 d)
IC −0,06 … −0,085
Spearman IC, slightly the wrong sign
Cost of following the daily Top 5
≈ 0.13%/day
66% daily turnover at 0.1% per side

None of these differences is significant. Fees alone would cost more than the point estimate. The only factor that kept the right sign is the volatility penalty (the most agitated assets did worse afterwards), and it was found after the fact: it remains a hypothesis to pre-register and test, not a rule.

How this was measured →

The screen: liquid assets only

Universe: Crypto.com USDT spot pairs. Main screen: assets with at least $10M of Binance volume over 24 h. Currencies, stablecoins and tokenized gold (EUR, PAXG, XAUT…) are kept out of the screen, as are illiquid assets.

Asset Price Volume 24 h Regime (MA20/50, 1 h) Trend 5 h RSI 14 (1 h) Volatility 20 h 7 d 30 d Score*
…

Click a column to sort. * Descriptive score: a hand-weighted sum of the columns (regime, trend, RSI, 7 d and 30 d momentum, liquidity, volatility). It was never calibrated and showed no predictive power (see the verdict above). Volatility = standard deviation of hourly returns over 20 h.

Assets kept out of the screen

Research: multi-timeframe lead-lag

Lagged correlations between 18 assets on 1 h, 4 h and 1 d candles (“does A move before B?”). This is a research layer: no bot, score or signal reads it. Re-estimated every week and tested on the following period (walk-forward), the relations did not hold: 47.3% (1 h), 48.7% (4 h) and 50.2% (1 d) of signs right, and no relation was still there in the next period. A round trip costs 10 to 40 times the measured edge.

…

Archives: shadow bot V10.1 and social confluence V7.2

Archived, measured result: −67.5%, mostly from fees

Both paper bots are archived as signals and paused since 8 October 2026. Their history is kept and stays readable.

Shadow bot capital
10 000 → 3 250,60
USDT · 31/05 → 08/10/2026
Volume traded
1,927× capital
≈ 10 rebalances per day
Before fees
−7.6%
fees make up almost all of the loss
References, same period
random −69% · BTC +12.7%
random = same dates and weights, assets drawn at random (median)

The shadow bot did not follow the Secret Arena score: it followed the lead-lag meta-signal V6. The social confluence (X Alpha and News Pulse) only filtered that bot's positions: at equal exposure its lanes lost as much, and the “consensus” lanes looked better mainly because they hardly traded (average exposure 0.02 to 0.05).

Kept history: /api/secret-arena/shadow-bot · /api/secret-arena/social-confluence/history

Method

How the screen is refreshed: every 15 minutes, outside the web server. A refresh whose universe is empty or abnormal never overwrites the previous screen: it is logged and the screen keeps its date, shown at the top of this page. General method of the site: /en/methodology

Research, not advice. This page describes public market data. It places no order, connects to no account, and nothing in it is an invitation to buy or sell.

Move from watching to proof

Test a strategy free in the Lab, keep your history with Builder.

Download the Lab See plans Survival Audit €9.90 once