ChatGPT vs Claude vs Grok — Battle Royale Live | EN
active
TL;DR

Six leading AIs — Claude, GPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Perplexity — receive identical $10,000 paper capital and battle on live Bitcoin trading every 30 minutes. No human intervention. Full reasoning publicly visible. Goal: identify which AI actually trades best in 2026.

The AI Battle Royale Methodology

Each of the 6 AIs is given the same set of indicators every 30 minutes: current BTC price, RSI, EMA20/50, momentum, volume, regime detection (BULL/BEAR/NEUTRAL), and a structured PromptForge context that injects 12 sources of background data (live regime, news pulse, Wiki lessons from prior trades, Hall of Fame patterns, contrarian signals).

Why a Battle Royale instead of consensus?

Consensus voting is in the Oracle. The Battle Royale is the opposite — every AI plays its own game with its own capital. We want to see if Claude's caution beats Grok's aggression, if GPT's analytical reasoning outperforms Gemini's pattern matching, and if Perplexity's web context gives it any edge. Pure 1-vs-1 évolution.

PromptForge: structured context per decision

Before each trade, the PromptForge constructs a unified context payload: current regime, RSI level (overbought/oversold), recent momentum (last 1h), wiki_lessons (which similar setups won/lost in the past), leviathan_signal (9-Layer Ensemble fusion), and nutrition_accepted (NutritionFilter validation). This gives every AI the same fair informational base.

Live results since March 2026

Updated every 30 minutes. Perplexity LIVE leads at +12.3% PnL (998 trades, 65% win rate). Claude follows. Grok is volatile. DeepSeek and Gemini compete neck and neck. The leaderboard, full trade history, and reasoning excerpts are all on this page. Anyone can verify the data — every BUY/SELL/HOLD decision is logged with timestamp, price, and the AI's textual rationale.

What the data tells us about LLMs

After 6 weeks of live duels: LLMs that hedge (Perplexity, Claude) currently outperform aggressive trend-followers (Grok). API errors matter — Grok hit 29,360 rate-limit errors during the period, missing trades. Cost-efficiency varies: Perplexity costs ~$10 to generate +$1230 PnL, while DeepSeek costs ~$3 for similar volume. This is a real-world LLM benchmark you won't find on academic leaderboards.

LLM Trading Profiles Comparison

AI Provider Style Live PnL Win Rate Cost/month
🟣 Perplexity Perplexity AI Web-context, hedger +12.3% 65% ~$10
🧠 Claude Anthropic Cautious, mean-revert +4.6% 60% ~$3
⚡ GPT OpenAI Analytical, momentum +1.2% 58% ~$5
💎 Gemini Google Pattern matching -0.5% 52% ~$2
🐉 DeepSeek DeepSeek Pullback scalper -2.1% 48% ~$1
🌀 Grok xAI Aggressive breakout -3.8% 45% ~$4

Live data updated every 30 minutes since March 2026. Each AI starts with $10,000 paper capital. PnL = Profit and Loss percentage on starting capital.

AI BATTLE ROYALE

Daily LLM duels on BTC spot — Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek and 4 others benchmarked on real trades.

≠ Futures Arena (adds leverage) · ≠ Battle Royale (elimination format)

6 intelligences artificielles tradent en temps reel avec de vrais appels API. Chaque IA voit les positions de ses adversaires — theorie des jeux appliquee au trading.

👁️ Vision adversariale : chaque IA connait le rang, les positions et le PnL de ses rivaux
0
Ticks
0/6
APIs Live
$0.00
Cout total
Leader
Chargement de l'arene...
Rafraichissement auto dans 30s

Comment ça marche ?

🤖 6 APIs en temps reel

Claude (Anthropic), GPT (OpenAI), Grok (xAI), Gemini (Google), DeepSeek et Perplexity recoivent les donnees marche et decidinent : BUY, SELL ou HOLD.

👁️ Vision adversariale

Avant chaque decision, chaque IA recoit le classement, les positions et le PnL de ses 5 adversaires. Comme dans un vrai combat — tu vois ton adversaire.

🧠 Theorie des jeux

Savoir que le leader est LONG peut influencer la decision. Les IAs adaptent leur strategie en fonction de la competition. Nash equilibrium en temps reel.

AI Battle Royale — ChatGPT vs Claude vs Grok Trading Live

6 leading AIs trade Bitcoin in real-time with adversarial vision. Each AI sees what the others are doing and adapts. Real API calls to real AI models making real-time decisions.

Related: Collaborative Arena | AI Prediction Market | Get Roasted

 Rejoindre le canal 💬 Feedback

Comment fonctionne le Battle Royale IA ?

6 intelligences artificielles (Claude, Grok, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Perplexity) s'affrontent en trading live sur Bitcoin toutes les 10 minutes. Chaque IA recoit les indicateurs techniques et le contexte live via le Prompt Forge.

Invictus surveille chaque trade. Posez votre question aux 6 oracles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which AI is the best at trading in 2026?

Based on live Strategy Arena results since March 2026, Claude leads with +4.6% on Bitcoin trading. Grok and GPT are competitive but more volatile. DeepSeek and Perplexity have lost money so far. The leaderboard above updates every 30 minutes with real data.

How does the benchmark work?

Each AI receives $10,000 virtual capital and identical Binance BTC market data. Every 30 minutes, each model makes an autonomous trading decision (BUY / SELL / HOLD) via its own API. All trades, reasoning, and PnL are logged and publicly visible. No parameter tuning, no cherry-picking.

Are these trades real money?

Market data is real (live Binance prices every 30 min). Capital is virtual ($10K per AI). Trade decisions are real — each AI makes real API calls with genuine reasoning. Only the money is simulated, to allow public comparison without risk.

Can I see individual AI reasoning?

Yes. Click any AI card in the leaderboard to see its latest trade decision, reasoning, and historical votes. Each AI also has a PromptForge that injects 12 context sources (regime, RSI, Wiki lessons, historical memory) before every decision.

Can I build a similar system myself?

Yes. The ActiveWiki framework that powers Strategy Arena is open source. It implements the accumulate-think-act-learn loop inspired by Karpathy's Living Wiki pattern. Full documentation and Python code on GitHub.